Comments on: Sarbanes-Oxley Goes to Supreme Court http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court Compliance Sarbanes Oxley, A Resource Guide for New and Established Businesses Requiring Sarbanes Oxley Compliance Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:30:59 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: 8Wonderboy http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-19 8Wonderboy Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-19 <b>yp:)</b> <br> yp:) yp:)
yp:)

]]> By: 8Wonderboy http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-20 8Wonderboy Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-20 <b>As usual//</b> <br> As usual// As usual//
As usual//

]]> By: MooseOfReason http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-21 MooseOfReason Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-21 <b>Welcome. :)</b> <br> Welcome. :) Welcome. :)
Welcome. :)

]]> By: papeluso http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-22 papeluso Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-22 <b>THANK YOU!!!!!!!!</b> <br> THANK YOU!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!

]]> By: MooseOfReason http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-23 MooseOfReason Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-23 <b>According to ...</b> <br> According to Christine Hall, the Communications Director for CEI: "The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires that "officers of the United States" be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But the officers serving on the PCAOB, with tremendous power to impose criminal and civil penalties on people and companies accused of violating accounting regulations, were not appointed that way." According to …
According to Christine Hall, the Communications Director for CEI:
“The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires that “officers of the United States” be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But the officers serving on the PCAOB, with tremendous power to impose criminal and civil penalties on people and companies accused of violating accounting regulations, were not appointed that way.”

]]> By: musicload http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-24 musicload Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-24 <b>Thank you for such ...</b> <br> Thank you for such insight. Thank you for such …
Thank you for such insight.

]]> By: papeluso http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-25 papeluso Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:01 +0000 http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley/sarbanes-oxley-goes-to-supreme-court#comment-25 <b>I love CEI, BUT.... ...</b> <br> I love CEI, BUT...... can you please explain what are the constitutional reasons why it is being challenge. I love CEI, BUT…. …
I love CEI, BUT……

can you please explain what are the constitutional reasons why it is being challenge.

]]>