<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20091103 Debate on Rep Garrett&#8217;s SOX Amendment 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2</link>
	<description>Compliance Sarbanes Oxley, A Resource Guide for New and Established Businesses Requiring Sarbanes Oxley Compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:30:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kimdaviscali</title>
		<link>http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>kimdaviscali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2#comment-117</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Have you given the ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Have you given the SLIGHTEST thought to how many companies over 75 million will now break up into subsidiaries ect to get under the 75 million ceiling? 150 million split up into two subs and now no more SOX? Come on, wake up!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Have you given the &#8230;</b> <br /> Have you given the SLIGHTEST thought to how many companies over 75 million will now break up into subsidiaries ect to get under the 75 million ceiling? 150 million split up into two subs and now no more SOX? Come on, wake up!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimdaviscali</title>
		<link>http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>kimdaviscali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2#comment-118</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Quit throwing out &quot; ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Quit throwing out &quot;The White House says do it&quot; &quot;The White House says do it&quot;.. .who cares what the White House says, they&#039;re not the experts in the field and aren&#039;t going to pay the retirements of the people who fall to the next Enron after you do this ridiculous act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Quit throwing out &#8221; &#8230;</b> <br /> Quit throwing out &#8220;The White House says do it&#8221; &#8220;The White House says do it&#8221;.. .who cares what the White House says, they&#8217;re not the experts in the field and aren&#8217;t going to pay the retirements of the people who fall to the next Enron after you do this ridiculous act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimdaviscali</title>
		<link>http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>kimdaviscali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesarbanesoxley.com/sarbanes-oxley-404/20091103-debate-on-rep-garretts-sox-amendment-2#comment-119</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;It does not ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; It does not maintain the status quo, now that they know there is no fear of an auditor knocking, they&#039;ll scrap any intent to comply now or in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>It does not &#8230;</b> <br /> It does not maintain the status quo, now that they know there is no fear of an auditor knocking, they&#8217;ll scrap any intent to comply now or in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
